Boeing 737! MAX is BACK! Re-certification and understanding MCAS! Explained by CAPTAIN JOE

------► MERCHANDISE CJ SHOP ◄ -------
▼▼My FLIGHT-KIT I highly recommend for you guys▼▼
Company iPad:
▼▼The VIDEO EQUIPMENT I use in my studio and outdoors▼▼
Dear friends and followers, welcome back to my channel!
In today's video we'll be looking at the famous Boeing 737 MAX. What caused the grounding of this plane? What did Boeing do to get her certified? I'll give you a better understanding of the MCAS system. The easiest explanation on how the system works by using a bicycle! I'll briefly mention the Angle of Attack vane that caused the problems with the MCAS! Is it safe to fly this beautiful airplane again?
Thank you very much for your time! I hope you enjoy this video!
Wishing you all the best!
Your "Captain" Joe
Big thank you to all other youtubers who provided me with the video material to create this video. Your content is highly appreciated. Please follow their channels:
@Mike Boyd
@Times of Oman
@Classic Airliners & Vintage Pop Culture
@Josh Jordan
@Ian Teo
@Sharjah24 News
@BAA training
@Anders Cornelius Olesen
Intro Song:
Lounge - Ehrling:
Outro Song:
Joakim Karud & Dyalla - Wish you were here

жүктөп алуу


  • Another brilliant video Joe, that last 90 seconds were so powerful and true, respect!

    Joe AchillesJoe Achilles29 күн мурун
    • NEO: Not Eating Octopus

      David MiddletonDavid MiddletonКүн мурун
    • @I Care not safe to me, I’ll never fly on a max if they don’t retire and scrap them

      Sebastian FloydSebastian FloydКүн мурун
    • @Sebastian Floyd With the max engine location and my background, until the FAA mandates proper blade off testing as I outlined in my post, from a scientific data testing point of view, I am going to avoid the max at this time as much as humanly possible until the proper blade off, on wing testing is done in current configuration and proven through at least 3 data blade off testing points to be safe. The fuselage damage that just occurred on United fight 328 would have been significant on a Boing 737 Max due to the Max engine location, in my opinion.

      I CareI CareКүн мурун
    • @I Care I ain’t gonna fly a max. They should be retired scrapped and never fly again

      Sebastian FloydSebastian FloydКүн мурун
    • The 737 NG & Max Engine: Location, location, location A broken fan blade, air inlet & cowling away from injury to death. After the tragic Southwest Airlines flight 1380 where a passenger was killed in a 737 NG in flight blade off event, the NTSB allegedly found the engine cowlings and air inlet smashed into and broke the passenger window, allegedly due to the location of the 737’s engines and lack of strength and fail safe engineering in the engine’s cowlings, air inlet, etc. during the broken “blade off” event. Eventhough death and destruction occurred, it is my understanding flight 1380 was classified as a “contained engine failure.” However, the NTSB apparently recommended Boeing redesign and significantly strengthen the 737 NG & Max engine cowlings, air inlet and reinforce the passenger fuselage and windows, which are highly vulnerable to engine explosion debris impacts due to the 737’s unique engine location up and in front of the wing. However, to my knowledge the FAA still has not mandated the NTSB flight 1380 737 recommendations. Even though Boeing “promised to incorporate the NTSB flight 1380 recommendations”, without updated mandated simulated real World blade off testing to validate the effectiveness of any such changes, the reality of the dangers of more in air and even ground blade off related fatalities and/or significant will occur, especially for passengers in the 737 NG and even more so in the 737 MAX where engine is even more exposed to the adjacent passengers Windows. With decades of advanced material reinforcement, testing and failure analysis engineering, in my opinion, the current required turbofan blade off test for engine safety certification, is NOT a real World simulation application validation safety test and therefore NOT VALID. Specifically, turbofan blade off testing deficiencies include, but not limited to: 1)not actual inflight air inlet installed 2)no actual inflight cowlings installed 3)no actual inflight cowling ring installed 4)not attached to actual pylon, wing,and fuselage section mock-up of airframe going to be attached to in flight 5)not conducted in wind tunnel to simulate inflight wind conditions as best as possible 6)not conducted in simulated takeoff, landing and turning angle configurations 7)etc. There are multiple, well documented cases were the FAA did not require the proper type of real World engine and other aircraft safety simulation testing certification which has resulted in loss of property and lives. Though blade off events are very rare, all materials, like humans, will fail at some point. Engineering “fail-safe failures”, validated through valid real World lab simulation testing, are required for real World application safety. Engineering a test to get a desired result is just as penny wise and pound foolish as “bean counters” who “win” over safety engineer’s warnings....always deadly outcomes and millions to billions more in costs. Without FAA mandates for increased blade off safety requirements that include all Engine components attached to the engine configured in real World applications, tested in the manner described above, additional damage, injuries and even death is all but guaranteed to continue. It’s only a matter of time, in my opinion.

      I CareI CareКүн мурун
  • Speaking on behalf of all 737 pilots across the globe, as a B737-800 captain myself, I can for sure say that we all feel terribly cheated. And Boeing is yet to instill its confidence back in us; which I don't feel it truly ever will.

    a sa s48 мүнөт мурун
  • Neo New Engine Option (but dont take me seriously because i have an anime pfp)

    IamAcatIamAcat3 саат мурун
  • Great video, but it is sad to see when greed wins. Boeing was a company of talented engineers, but became a company of "efective managers" who only care about their bonuses. The problem is that Boeing is an important company for US economy as well as military, so they still got away with "murder". Somebody has to be held accountable for these deaths. People involved had go to jail and the company had to be restructured so it won't happen again...

    kam1nokagekam1nokage4 саат мурун
  • Can’t trust Boeing or that FAA. I wouldn’t want to fly those coffins.

    Michael AfubwaMichael Afubwa4 саат мурун
  • I'll never trust flying on one of those DEATH-TRAPS!

    web Surfinweb Surfin5 саат мурун
  • two planes crashed and killed a lot people, this model should be banned forever

    mario scandelimario scandeli6 саат мурун
  • Ford: "Our new car jerks to the right all the time but we'll save money by not fixing the mechanical problem. Instead, we'll use a "software" fix. Maybe a computer will tell a little arm to come out and push the steering wheel right. What a moneysaver!" Boeing moved their Seattle headquarters, formerly run by engineers, to Chicago, where it was run by bean counters. Except they didn't have so many beans to count. Still, a lot of people don't know they're the second biggest military contractor, and we'll be getting in another war soon enough.

    Jim MooneyJim Mooney6 саат мурун
  • I'll never fly on boeing hardware again. I flew 3 times last year and didn't step foot on one.

    nissanv8FTWnissanv8FTW7 саат мурун
  • Well, those deaths don't count for 'Murricans because, you know, some non-White non-American people died. Shame on the U.S, and shame on Americans.

    FichDich InDemArschFichDich InDemArsch7 саат мурун
  • Is captain Joe taking shots at mentour pilot 👀

    Master PMaster P7 саат мурун
  • If it's Boeing, then you're surely dying!

    FichDich InDemArschFichDich InDemArsch7 саат мурун
  • Boeing has been dealing with a ton of Corporate greed in recent and has allowed there construction of aircrafts to become worse and worse

    RwoarrrRwoarrr9 саат мурун
  • Boeing software was also bad in its space program. Terrible company.

    MarlinspikeMarlinspike9 саат мурун
  • MCAS: May crash any second

    HenrikHenrik9 саат мурун
  • NEO - New Engine Option, or in other words making more money than Boeing!

    ArrrGeeArrrGee11 саат мурун
  • NEO= New Engine Option

    MAX SpezialbauAGMAX SpezialbauAG11 саат мурун
  • Sounds like bad engineering which will in turn cause more wear and tear on the elevators... More service time, more costs associated to keep the planes in the fleet

    Colby PictonColby Picton11 саат мурун
  • Brilliant .....

    asiri weerasooriyaasiri weerasooriya11 саат мурун
  • Before you book check to see if your aircraft is a Max. If it is, choose an airline that has another aircraft. The Max is basically the same aircraft.

    Brian John HawkeswoodBrian John Hawkeswood11 саат мурун
  • Ex Air Force and I won’t be flying in one. The A320 will do me just fine..

    Stephen Page-MurrayStephen Page-Murray12 саат мурун
  • I'm amazed they've hunkered down and are really going to try to ram the MAX down the throat of passenger air-travel. No one has been punished, there's no official explanation, how greed was been allowed to eat thus deeply into basic safety rules, the company has not been taken over by a public authority, the corruption at the FAA has not been cleaned out. And they expect advertisement and propaganda to restore the trust of the public and the airmen. Until the next mass slaughter.

    Chavdar NaidenovChavdar Naidenov12 саат мурун
  • Surely the problem is not the software, the problem is that Boeing are trying to fit an incompatible engine to an old and out-dated airframe? If I was a pilot, I would refuse to fly an aircraft that relied on software to fly it 'safely' because the engine/airframe combination was incompatible! Boeing are nothing short of criminal and cavalier in their approach to aircraft design!!!

    BAANi BarnesBAANi Barnes12 саат мурун
  • The abnormal interactive greely move because drop logistically pray without a cloudy policeman. terrible, ceaseless nancy

    SEMA james LLLKkaniaruSEMA james LLLKkaniaru13 саат мурун
  • If only they didnt add yet another disconnect between the pilot and the plane those two planes wouldn't have crashed. Maybe, oh i dont pilots to be pilots? Otherwise might as well just have google fly all our planes now....

    zombieregimezombieregime13 саат мурун
  • Killer is back

    Chien Chunng TsaurChien Chunng Tsaur14 саат мурун
  • These Boeing guys are shameless,how they clear max 8 planes yet fetality case are still in court ,r.i.p all Ethiopian airline victims and esp anty christine

    emmanuel omadiemmanuel omadi14 саат мурун
  • People and airlines should not fly these again what Boeing did was unforgivable in my oppinion and I’ll never ride a Boeing again

    NaiLsByJasMinENaiLsByJasMinE14 саат мурун
  • 10:48 Damn... you could've just hit 2 switches and turned the damn thing off? I imagine every 737 pilot is WELL aware of this now, so if push comes to shove they can turn it off.

    JoeJoe15 саат мурун
    • but they need to be quick! MCAS can spin those trim wheels so far so fast that getting the trim back to sanity manually is very heavy & sustained work against the airflow....

      FerneyFerney10 саат мурун
  • Haha, how many people do you need to kill before they'll let you fail?

    Operator 801Operator 80115 саат мурун
  • Corporate greed keeps me up at night thinking how my kids will be affected in the future seeing how easy a giant like Boing can get around this disgusting tragedy.

    Andrew SimoneAndrew Simone15 саат мурун
  • Fuck Boeing. They created an aircraft that when malfunctioned essentially executes a kamikaze. Seemingly they decided to not train pilots on how to detect and override this system simply to save money which then resulted in hundreds of people loosing their lives. Lives that seemingly had no reason to die early other than corporate greed.

    HellHell16 саат мурун
  • Can’t believe there isn’t a better sensor. The thing is basically a weather vane bolted to the outside of the plane in all weather conditions. Seems some pilots knew about this system and some didn’t particularly in the third world. 🤔

    Richard HusseyRichard Hussey16 саат мурун
  • Personally, I wouldn't fly in one, to many deaths..737 MAX.....MCAS = Might Crash Aircraft Suddenly.

  • The hell with that plane!

    Stand AloneStand Alone17 саат мурун
  • Excellent video Joe !! The engineering staff from NASA must have made its way into our airline industry !! Profit before safety !!

    OneHairyGuyOneHairyGuy18 саат мурун
  • Fixed or not, I don't think I'd be getting in a MAX any time soon... I'd go as far as to pay for a completely separate flight before getting on one of those deathtraps.

    ZeroOneInfinityZeroOneInfinity19 саат мурун
  • What a great video Joe, thank you so much!!! 'Keep the blue side up' A pilot saying. Can anyone guess it's meaning? Leave a comment bellow. Thanks.

    RMD 420RMD 42019 саат мурун
  • NEO: New Engine Option. It refers to the engines. Bigger and more efficient

    RMD 420RMD 42020 саат мурун
  • Only the early 737-100/200's had the engines mounted under the wings. Starting with the 737-300, the engines have all been mounted foward of the wings.

    Sean HollingsworthSean Hollingsworth20 саат мурун
  • The upshot is that Boeing has an aeroplane that doesn't fly properly because its made too many changes without fully redesigning it. Instability is desired for fighter but not for anything carrying people from one place to another. New certification of a non inherently good aircraft doesn't mean a good path for Boeing.

    simon van Rijssimon van Rijs21 саат мурун
  • The various plaster uncommonly hammer because hour legally worry of a sneaky deal. adorable, abnormal grip

    James GeigerJames Geiger21 саат мурун
  • I won't use this flying coffin ever again . The discomfort alone will kill you .

    Talica TinaiTalica Tinai21 саат мурун
  • after those deaths at least the director of FAA, the director of EASA, the CEO of Boeing, the cheaf security of Boeing should had to step aside, but none of this happened

    pierre jeanpierre jean23 саат мурун
  • I stg if they start falling again I'm gonna. Well I'm not going to do anything but I'll be super upset.

    Ali AbdallahAli Abdallah23 саат мурун
  • 13:30 wat makes ME more sad is that 346 souls had gone because of a group of millonaires wanted to make more money without thinking in the fatal consecuences

    pierre jeanpierre jeanКүн мурун
  • 346 lives has been lost because of cooperate greed and corruption, I don’t understand how no body from Boeing or the FAA went to jail for this horrendous criminal act. We the people has absolutely no representation from our elected officials and that’s a damn shame. What has this world come to?

    ibkoool1ibkoool1Күн мурун
  • Nice try CJ, but some of the statements are a bit inaccurate. According to the official report on the crash, even deactivating MCAS by stab. trim cutout switches would have no effect on controllability. (In case of the horizontal stabilizer, at high airspeeds the aerodynamic loads on the control surfaces are getting excessively high to regain manual control.) Your closing remarks are about a massive financial hit, I'd think that the loss of trust and reputation is even more important and will be effecting the company for decades to come. Cheers!

    Robert FeherRobert FeherКүн мурун
  • The 737 MCAS is back .....

    C F LC F LКүн мурун
  • Thank you for another great video Captain Joe! As a passenger, I now do everything possible to avoid flying on all Boeing aircraft. I live in the PNW and Boeing is in my backyard, but given everything with the Max and 787, on top of the way they treat the employees in this area, I’m over Boeing. Search and watch the hidden camera video that was filmed at the 787 plant in South Carolina if you need more proof of the corporate greed that has ruined a once iconic company.

    GreenCountryM CGreenCountryM CКүн мурун
  • Famous don't you mean infamous

    AmathusukxAmathusukxКүн мурун
  • The biggest problem with the 'Western Economic System' is that investors and fund managers want the CORPORATIONS to deliver perpetual increasing profits. They are not happy with a consistent annual profit. Each Quarter, Each year 'has to be bigger, better and more profitable than the previous. This leads to short-cuts in many areas, and sort cutting in , R&D, and manufacturing. When the need for perpetual Economic 'growth' is eliminated and the associated 'Greed' safety will improve. Also, instead of fining the CORPORATIONS, shut down their entire operation for 12 months. Seize their assets and use those to pay the employees (excluding Executives) at least 75% of their income, a salary for the shutdown period. Executives i.e decision-makers to receive $0. They have earned enough to survive, where many of the victims of their decisions did not survive.

    Andrew_koalaAndrew_koalaКүн мурун
  • The sad part is that the managers that were responsible for the bad decisions and culminated in all of this will not be held liable themselves - no one's going to prison.

    code_dreddcode_dreddКүн мурун
    • Just like the CRIMINALS who run Washington DC!

      web Surfinweb Surfin5 саат мурун
  • why don't they just remove this software and MCAS altogether, and let pilots fly?

    woods_of_the_beachwoods_of_the_beachКүн мурун
  • Neo means new engine option

    Supermarinespitfire13Supermarinespitfire13Күн мурун
  • The De Haviland Comet was grounded following two fatal incidents. On Saturday May 2 1953 one year to the day after the maiden flight of the British-made de Havilland Comet, aircraft G-ALYV departed Calcutta Airport for Delhi as BOAC Flight 783 A few miles out of the airport, the flight encountered a severe thunderstorm. While the pilot and air traffic control [ATC] were both aware of the storm, it did not appear severe enough to restrict flight through it. Furthermore, the captain was well-qualified, had considerable experience on this route, and had experience in similar weather conditions. Just six minutes after take-off, while climbing to 7,500 feet, [FL750] radio communication was lost. About this same time, witnesses at various ground locations saw "an aircraft coming down in a blaze of fire through severe thunderstorm and rain" and then crash into the ground. All 37 passengers and six crew members were killed. The inquiry into the accident, directed by the Central Government of India, concluded that the crash near Calcutta was due to "structural failure of the airframe during flight through a thunder-squall." The inquiry determined that one of two possibilities caused an over-stressing of the plane enough to crash it: (a) either severe gusts from the storm, or (b) over-controlling by the pilot because of the storm. It was recommended that the wreckage be more thoroughly analyzed to determine the primary failure, and that "consideration should be given" to modifying the flying characteristics of the Comet to give it more "feel" when loads are applied to the control surfaces. Elba - BOAC Flight 781 On Sunday, January 10, 1954 Comet G-ALYP departed Ciampino Airport Rome for London as BOAC Flight 781 About 20 minutes into the flight, as it was approaching 27,000 feet, [FL270] transmission from the crew ceased mid-sentence, indicating a failure of the aircraft with "catastrophic suddenness." Witnesses on the island of Elba (Italy), saw the aircraft fall into the sea in flames. All 29 passengers and six crew members were killed. The Comet fleet was grounded while investigation began and while de Havilland made modifications "to cover every possibility that imagination has suggested as a likely cause of the disaster." These modifications were made to address any possible cause of failure including flutter of control surfaces, primary structural failure due to gusts, flying controls, explosive decompression, engine fire, failure of a turbine blade, and fatigue of the wing. Fatigue of the fuselage was not considered as a cause at this time, nor was a modification made to compensate for it. As these modifications were made, and while the wreckage was still being recovered, the British Minister of Transport and Civil Aviation noted "the nature and extent of the modifications planned... and whilst the Calcutta disaster is completely accounted for... we cannot eliminate that the accident might have been due to some other cause which was possibly common to both disasters. " Believing the unknown cause of possibly two accidents had been fixed during the massive modification project, Comet flight was resumed March 23, 1954 Just over two weeks later, on Thursday April 8, 1954 Comet G-ALYY departed Ciampino Airport Rome for Cairo, as South African Airlines Flight 201, chartered through BOAC. About 40 minutes into the flight, while climbing through 35,000 feet, [FL350] the aircraft experienced a catastrophic in-flight break-up and crashed into the sea near Naples. All 14 passengers and seven crew members were killed. [REPORT]: de Havilland Comet - 1952-1953 - FAA Report ► British Overseas Airways Corporation Flight 781 ► BOAC Flight 781 De Havilland Comet Mid Air Explosion

    Andrew_koalaAndrew_koalaКүн мурун
  • Yes Boeing suffered a great financial lost. But No financial lost can be compared to the lost of lives in the two accidents

    Yiduo ZhanYiduo ZhanКүн мурун
  • MH17 (MAS17 / KL4103) ~ what happened there?

    UsUsКүн мурун
  • Joe, as an Avionics tech that worked on AOA sensors, radar, comm etc etc, and while I don't know the MCAS system itself (out of the airline industry before MCAS came along) I have to question though, why the system entirely relied on AOA sensors. That is a sensor that OFTEN fails and requires rectification. You'd think they'd have built reduncancy and balance checks like loss of altitude, the computers should have sensed that and "disregarded" the AOA. The fact it didn't or doesn't seems bizarre in my imagination. I mean, my God, how many systems are in that plane such as radar and comm systems. Ground mapping radar? AOA is such an old old old school technology, as someone with a technical engineering background, I'm baffled that MCAS was so utterly reliant on it. So the next question is, what has Boeing done to rectify this issue?

    Martin StepanekMartin StepanekКүн мурун
  • I will NOT be boarding any 737MAX aircraft until three years have elapsed after the recertification & revenue flight of this contraption with zero accidents!

    magellanmaxmagellanmaxКүн мурун
  • Profits before safety & peoples lives... Those responsible at Boeing & the FAA should be jailed on 346 counts of man slaughter!!

    Adam RichardsAdam RichardsКүн мурун
  • NEO usually means “New”

    Rebel N TrainsRebel N TrainsКүн мурун
  • Airbus NEO = Airbus New Engine Option

    Samuel KarlssonSamuel KarlssonКүн мурун

    Muhammad SiddiqiMuhammad SiddiqiКүн мурун
  • 👍💚❤️👍

    shamim khanshamim khanКүн мурун
  • So why didn’t Boeing just slightly pitch down the vertical stabilizer causing a natural way to keep the pitch under control?

    Gavin McGuinnessGavin McGuinnessКүн мурун
  • sir, please let me know what is to be done on a death dive recovery the reason for the lion air crash

    Vijai BabuVijai BabuКүн мурун
  • Very objective appraisal of MCAS. In my time with an airline both on the ground and in Flight as a Cabin Attendant, I was associated with 707’s, DC-30’s and 747-200’s. I experienced the groundings of the DC-10’s and the “fix” with the micro switch on the Girt Bar after the Cargo Door close (Green Light). McDonnell Douglas stood up and tackled the problem under public view and much scrutiny. Now seeing how Boeing has behaved and tried to rationalize their position by not including the additional training and even ware ness of the issue with their most loyal Customers. My point is there is there is comparison between how these 2 Aircraft Manufacturers took on their problems. For a time Passengers wouldn’t fly on DC-10’s making it necessary to change to MD-11 There is an underlying and disgusting element and I haven’t heard anyone communicate about it. The Ugly Shareholder, now has come into the light of day. No longer are Airline Manufacturers being guided solely the trusted Designers and Engineers who didn’t stop until safety was Never an issue. Today it’s all about meeting deadlines to ensure delivery dates. Cutting corners and costs to ensure Profit. Boeing still hasn’t come clean and they will be drummed out Washington State by the very same Shareholders, who will push the Assembly Lines into the East Coast non Union environment on a full time basis. I will never fly on a Boeing Jet again.

    Dan McBrideDan McBrideКүн мурун
  • Please fix your audio. Recorded conversations are TOO loud as compared to your voice volume. I'd suggest you NOT using mics that capture open spaces, rather unidirectional or lapel mics, which will ONLY capture your voice and will help you create a much better experience. Regards

    David R. FloresDavid R. FloresКүн мурун
  • Well - she was legally certified before too... so no thank you.

    IdoNOThaveaBossIdoNOThaveaBossКүн мурун
  • NEO new engine option :)

    Kurtlittle4Kurtlittle4Күн мурун
  • People need too stop being so sceptical of the new 737 max if the FAA says its safe i wil gladly fly in it.

    Lucas lunenborgLucas lunenborgКүн мурун
  • Reports said pilots were facing this problem before the crashes, but nothing reported . Even after the first crash Boeing didn't take any initiative to correct the fault. Then the second incident happened. This is pure negligence and whoever involved have to take the responsibility. Safety shouldn't be compromised by any means.

    Mahbubul IslamMahbubul IslamКүн мурун
  • Captain Joe, your comments and my thoughts about this whole profit before all else mentality has really made me doubt the old mantra of aviation being the safest mode of transport. Cutting corners and having the money to lobby the US flight safety body is so chilling a concept. Now all airlines and aircraft manufacturers are chomping at the bit to get back in the sky using planes that have been static and fewer skilled engineers available to get them airworthy again. Worse still, are laid off pilots who may have not been able to afford to maintain flight hours due to financial constraints. For now I’m just going to take the bus? Am I worrying too much Captain Joe?

    ScrotusXLScrotusXLКүн мурун
  • Seeing as everyone is memeing the video. I'll give a serious answer. NEO = New Engine Option. CEO (prev gen airbus engines) = Classic Engine Option.

    Simone HarrisonSimone HarrisonКүн мурун
  • More like infamous

    Barry BoltonBarry BoltonКүн мурун
  • I'd rebook my flight...if I found out, I was on that plane...Sorry...I don't trust it...I don't care what they say...or what they said to fix it...many lost they're that plane...that was supposed to be...State of the Art, in the first place...I pass.

    Craig HallCraig HallКүн мурун
  • Please let me understand how could a safety system led to crash a plane? There are no other systems with higher priority to cut off MCAS when the plane is falling? I mean keep the plane airborne is the highest priority, so some sort of so-called watchdog system would have to cut off MCAS system automatically! Over that, there is no system to detect a malfunctioning AoA? if these softwares are really that dumb, Boeing really have to invest to improve his software division.

    Edmund ElmerEdmund ElmerКүн мурун
  • Automatic trimming tabs ?

    David SheriffDavid SheriffКүн мурун
  • Nope, nuh uh, no chance. If it's a Boeing I'm not going.

    Phuket WurdPhuket WurdКүн мурун
  • I put a lot of the problems down to the MBA courses. People thinking they can manage a business just on the balance sheet. You can't any more than you can drive a car just on the ignition switch.

    Andy BushAndy BushКүн мурун
  • maximize shareholder value.... the same thing is killing the safety of the railroads in the US with their PRS and push for single person crews...

    truthsayerstruthsayersКүн мурун

    Karanveer SalujaKaranveer SalujaКүн мурун
  • Someday Star Trek-style teletransporters will make all of this seem quite primitive.

    Russ FerrisRuss FerrisКүн мурун
  • 0:25 i thought it was gonna stall out

    AviationandgamingAviationandgamingКүн мурун
  • The nifty timbale timely spark because steven microscopically fax an a closed brass. pink, likeable mascara

    Ryan BrooksRyan BrooksКүн мурун
  • Excellent video!

    Bruce VaiBruce VaiКүн мурун
  • So, does MCAS still have the capability to override pilot control?

    Andy SellemanAndy Selleman2 күн мурун
    • No. In fact, MCAS could never override pilot input directly, only indirectly by trimming the stabilizer more than the pilots can counter with the yoke alone. But that has been taken care of, now MCAS also can't trim too much, so even if the pilots don't turn it off immediately they won't lose control.

      Kalle KKalle KКүн мурун
  • 737 MAX is fine. it's just not for dumb pilots.

    master totnakmaster totnak2 күн мурун
  • Airbus NEO stands for New Engine Option

    Sujal ShettySujal Shetty2 күн мурун
  • Boeing’s process with redesigning the most popular plane ever:: 1) Airlines want a new efficient plane fast without pilot training 2) Put bigger engines on 737 3) Oh they don’t fit? Mount them more forward 4) Oh the more powerful engines mounted forward creates too much pitch? Add new software to auto correct 5) Oh the software needs pitch sensors? Add sensors 6) Oh the sensors and software could fail? Add off switch 7) Oh we didn’t train the pilots about the off switch? Add budget to pay for lawsuits and fines for crashes

    PlutoMattersPlutoMatters2 күн мурун
  • Uh" no thanks " max

    Ruben YuRuben Yu2 күн мурун
  • Money, money, money is all that is counting for Boeing and FAA supports them!

    Jedin 375Jedin 3752 күн мурун
  • The bottom line is the 737 is now in the fighter aircraft category, aka it's inherently unstable...... and no amount of gizmo's & software is going to change that. If they want to do what's right for the public..... reintroduce the 727 "whisper jet" less the 3rd hole with the new engines. The morale of this story is Boeing hasn't learned a damn thing, including the FAA.

    GenasysMechGenasysMech2 күн мурун
    • The 737 MAX is stable, that's a proven fact. The media might say something else, but what do they know.

      Kalle KKalle KКүн мурун
  • Is that halo music?

    david ramseydavid ramsey2 күн мурун
  • Still wont fly boeing built. I dont trust them any further than I can throw them. Just another soul less company in it only to make the big bucks for the big bosses and stockholders. (Who probably fly in their own LEAR OR CESSNA business jets.)

    K OlsenK Olsen2 күн мурун
    • The ONLY company in aviation that makes planes that don't spontaneously fall from the sky is Embraer, and the ERJ's have by far to date THE SAFEST service record of any jet in the sky! There's just one, teeny, tiny, itsy-bitsy, wiiddle problem... they're a region jet manufacturer. . .

      Tyvern OverlordTyvern Overlord2 күн мурун
  • Boeing has always and will continue to get billions of our tax dollars every year to kill people overseas. Nothing new to see here

    Aiden GAiden G2 күн мурун
  • Airbus planes are more comfortable to ride in

    Aiden GAiden G2 күн мурун
  • No matter what improvements Boeing makes, the fact remains this design is inherently flawed. I will not get on one of these planes. Corporate greed on full display here.

    WilliamWilliam2 күн мурун
  • so we still get same "out of the balance" plane/engine design - which defies flight physics. but we do have a new software. and pilot needs to be trained to fight against mistakes that software makes. amazing, seems like logical and non-profit decision once again.

    Mada F. JonesMada F. Jones2 күн мурун
    • The plane is not out of balance, it flies using the same flight physics as other airliners. CG before CP, stabilizer counters it and can be trimmed. If it defied flight physics it couldn't fly at all. Otherwise I'd love to have such kind of software for my car to fly out of traffic jams, as my car physically cannot fly.

      Kalle KKalle KКүн мурун